Checks and Balance picks: Are the pollsters ready for 2024?

PODCAST:Checks and Balance from The Economist
TITLE:Checks and Balance picks: Are the pollsters ready for 2024?
DATE:2024-01-05 00:00:00
URL:
MODEL:text-davinci-002-render-sha


Here is a summary of the key points from the podcast "Checks and Balance" titled "Are the pollsters ready for 2024":

  • The podcast discusses the trustworthiness of polls in the upcoming 2024 election and the lessons learned from the 2016 and 2020 elections.

  • In the past two presidential cycles, polls underestimated support for Donald Trump, and he is likely to be the Republican nominee again.

  • Pollsters have struggled to capture the support of Trump's voters who are less likely to participate in pre-election surveys but turn out to vote.

  • Pollsters use various methods to adjust their samples, including selecting a more representative sample and giving more weight to underrepresented groups.

  • In 2016, state-level polls failed to accurately predict the election outcome due to missed respondents with lower education levels.

  • Pollsters improved their methods in the 2018 midterms but faced another meltdown in 2020 with the largest miss in 40 years.

  • It's challenging to identify the exact reasons for poll errors, but distrust in institutions like the federal government and the media may have played a role.

  • Changes in technology have also impacted polling, with online polls becoming more prevalent but raising concerns about representativeness.

  • Pollsters are using a combination of survey methods, including online, text, telephone, and postal surveys, to obtain a fuller picture of the electorate.

  • Voter rolls and databases are increasingly used to identify respondents who may be averse to speaking to pollsters.

  • While the 2022 midterms showed improved polling accuracy, it remains uncertain whether the same can be achieved in a general election involving Mr. Trump.

  • Pollsters and experts advise caution when interpreting polls, suggesting that polling averages are more reliable than individual polls.

  • Focus on swing states that determine the Electoral College outcome, as the election is likely to be close.

  • Polls showing a large lead for either candidate are likely outliers, so a balanced approach is recommended when analyzing polling data.